[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#635126: status of ruby 1.9.1 wrt porting



On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:37:34AM +0000, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello Lennart,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:08:29AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:48:34PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Ruby 1.9.3 is going to be released in september, and is a candidate for
> > > the default ruby version in wheezy. A snapshot is available in
> > > experimental. Now is an ideal time to work on porting issues and get the
> > > fixes integrated upstream. Ruby has a fairly large test suite, which
> > > makes finding problems easy, but exercises the threading library in
> > > interesting ways.
> > > 
> > > Most of the issues are reproducible by re-building the Debian package.
> > > Use make && make test to get a shorter build.
> > > 
> > > Here is the current complete list of issues I'm aware of. My time will
> > > be very limited in the coming weeks, but I will try my best to provide
> > > help.
> > > 
> > > [armel,sparc] FTBFS due to miscompilation with -ftree-sra (inc. in -O3).
> > > See http://bugs.debian.org/635126.
> > > Currently worked-around by using -fno-tree-sra.
> > > Other packages might be affected.
> > > -> FIXED from ruby1.9.1's POV, but you really want to look at this
> > >    for other packages.
> > > 
> > > [armel] I've just seen that now that this one is fixed, the test suite
> > > segfaults.
> > > See
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ruby1.9.1&arch=armel&ver=1.9.3~preview1%2Bsvn33077-1&stamp=1314634969
> > > search for 'TestFiber#test_many_fibers'.
> > > 'make test-all' to reproduce. Failures during test-all are currently not
> > > fatal. The remaining ones needs more investigation, but I don't think
> > > that they are arch-specific. I'd like to make test-all failures fatal at
> > > some point.
>  
> > Building on armhf seemed to go fine, and running some of the examples
> > looked good too.
> 
> Lennart, could you try to rebuild on armhf, we are trying to bootstrap armhf in
> official main and contrib Debian archive, but build seems to hang:
> 
> See https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ruby1.9.1&arch=armhf&ver=1.9.3.0-1&stamp=1322758500
> 
> Now, trying to build with -fno-tree-sra.

I will give it a try as soon as I get home and power it up again.
Last nights power failure shut it off and the mx53 doesn't auto power
on without hardware mods.  Seems the UPS needs a new battery.

-- 
Len Sorensen


Reply to: