Re: Bug #522583: fping broken on some arm systems?
- To: Niko Tyni <ntyni@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-arm@lists.debian.org, 522583@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug #522583: fping broken on some arm systems?
- From: "Rob J. Epping" <rob.epping@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:35:14 +0100
- Message-id: <AANLkTi=LSOnvVw1Tg+YWtWuqDD0zhOHtK7652+adE7h6@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20101118203840.GB13383@madeleine.local.invalid>
- References: <20101118203840.GB13383@madeleine.local.invalid>
Hi
> Could a few armel users please install fping 2.4b2-to-ipv6-16.1 from
> squeeze or sid (it's also installable on a plain lenny system) and report
> back (either privately to me or to 522583@bugs.debian.org) if they see
> things like
As initial reporter of 522583 I tested again on my QNAP TS-219 with
the same strange results.
epping@QNAP:~$ uname -a
Linux QNAP 2.6.32-bpo.5-kirkwood #1 Thu Oct 28 07:00:55 UTC 2010
armv5tel GNU/Linux
epping@QNAP:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
5.0.6
epping@QNAP:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
Processor : Feroceon 88FR131 rev 1 (v5l)
BogoMIPS : 1199.30
Features : swp half thumb fastmult edsp
CPU implementer : 0x56
CPU architecture: 5TE
CPU variant : 0x2
CPU part : 0x131
CPU revision : 1
Hardware : QNAP TS-119/TS-219
Revision : 0000
Serial : 0000000000000000
epping@QNAP:~$ dpkg -s fping | grep Version
Version: 2.4b2-to-ipv6-15
epping@QNAP:~$ fping -C 5 localhost
localhost : [0], 84 bytes, 1998895 ms (1998895 avg, 0% loss)
localhost : [1], 84 bytes, 386800 ms (1192847 avg, 0% loss)
localhost : [2], 84 bytes, 0.-132287685 ms (354273 avg, 0% loss)
localhost : [3], 84 bytes, 1415240 ms (619515 avg, 0% loss)
localhost : [4], 84 bytes, 0.-19082523 ms (457446 avg, 0% loss)
localhost : 1998895.68 386800.20 - 1415240.99 -
epping@QNAP:~$
> and/or the reported nonsense duplicate lines like
>
> # fping -ei 1000 -c 10 194.109.5.227
> 194.109.5.227 : [0], 84 bytes, 0.-182238712 ms (0.-182238712 avg, 0% loss)
> 194.109.5.227 : duplicate for [16777217], 84 bytes, 969531 ms
> 194.109.5.227 : [16777217], 84 bytes, 969531 ms (0.-42642786 avg, 0% loss)
> 194.109.5.227 : duplicate for [33554434], 84 bytes, 0.-79624590 ms
Also note the weird (negative(?)) response times....
Was planning on mail this list too, but you beat me to it Niko. THNX!
--
GRTNX,
RobJE
Reply to: