Re: Status of armel in the archive?

To: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
Cc: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, 439832@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Status of armel in the archive?
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:22:06 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080131002205.GA2497@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080130232205.GA22042@kos.to>
References: <87bq84373s.fsf@pindar.marcbrockschmidt.de> <[🔎] 20080130214851.GA3798@station.luk.local> <[🔎] 20080130232205.GA22042@kos.to>

* Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi> [2008-01-31 01:22]:
> [1] I can ofcourse only speak of myself, but AFAIK other porters
> agree.

I think there's agreement on this.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Status of armel in the archive?
  - From: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>
- Re: Status of armel in the archive?
  - From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: Status of armel in the archive?
Next by Date: NSLU2 apex boot problems
Previous by thread: Re: Status of armel in the archive?
Next by thread: Re: Status of armel in the archive?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread