Re: more ram/swap on leisner, please?
- To: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>
- Cc: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>, debian-admin@lists.debian.org, Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, pb@debian.org
- Subject: Re: more ram/swap on leisner, please?
- From: Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:39:54 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20080104073953.GV29363@asteria.noreply.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>, Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>, Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>, debian-admin@lists.debian.org, Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, pb@debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 477BDF32.7050901@billgatliff.com>
- References: <20071117212058.GG28705@knossos.aleph1.co.uk> <54ejd06wum.fsf_-_@intech19.enhanced.com> <[🔎] 20080102163145.GG19687@knossos.aleph1.co.uk> <[🔎] 20080102181707.GO29363@asteria.noreply.org> <[🔎] 477BDF32.7050901@billgatliff.com>
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> The kernel is NOT running the nbd swap patch, so I don't know if the
> system will deadlock under stress, or not...
Upgraded the chroots last night - or tried to. It has exceptionally
slow so I had to leave it running when I went to bed. This morning the
box appears to be offline - did it lock up or is this just a
coincidence? :)
Peter
--
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `- http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: