Re: alternative Webserver as Apache
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 19:29 +0200, Mikael Rudberg wrote:
> I would also recommend that you use eAccelerator
> (http://eaccelerator.net/) it really improves performance alot if you
> use a CMS like Joomla (like i do).
Indeed. I use it for wordpress and gallery2 and it really speeds up
everything. However, I'm still trying to figure out things like the
cache size. It shouldn't be too large, or the thing may be swapping its
php script cache in and out of resident memory. Generally, when you try
to run an elaborate cms you will run into memory shortage. And _really_,
you should google around to reduce your mysql memory size, among other
things...
David
>
> /Mikael
> >
> >
> > David Fokkema wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 08:15 +0100, Jon Ervine wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tuesday 22 May 2007 07:53:29 Dirk Schleicher wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello there,
> >>>>
> >>>> I looking for a small alternative of a webserver with php and mysql
> >>>> for
> >>>> my slug.
> >>>> What can I use instead of Apache? But it has to be compatible to
> >>>> mentioned above.
> >>>>
> >>> lighttpd might be worth a look.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I've been using lighttpd with php and mysql for about four months now on
> >> a slug. I'm very impressed with it. However, What do you (OP) mean when
> >> you say 'it has to be compatible to mentioned above'? You can be assured
> >> that sites which only need php and mysql (almost every cms, gallery or
> >> whatever out there) will run on lighttpd. However, the server
> >> configuration is totally different. There is lots of info on the
> >> lighttpd wiki pages http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/Docs. When you
> >> install, say, gallery2 on your debian server, it won't work out of the
> >> box. Gallery2 comes with a configurator script for apache*, but not for
> >> lighttpd. However, reading through the lighttpd docs, you'll get it up
> >> and running in no-time.
> >>
> >> Good luck,
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >>
> >>> Jon
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Reply to: