On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 21:07 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 09:09 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Ok, is there some other difference at the instruction set level between the
> > netwinder and cats systems?
>
> No, the instruction sets are the same. FWIW, though, smackdown is
> actually a cats, not a netwinder, and the build seems to be failing
> there in any case.
Wrong.
Ups my fault, no it failed on smacksdown once [0] because of a different
bug, as described in the changelog of 1.1.17-3:
+ debian/patches/arm_support_larger_stack_r65218.dpatch:
- Should fix ARM FTBFS, taken from upstream SVN, thus urgency=medium.
So we are back to, it never failed to build on cats, but always did on netwinder.
[0] http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=mono&ver=1.1.17.1-1&arch=arm&stamp=1157335424&file=log
--
Regards,
Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
PGP-Key:
http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL++++$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O---- M-
V? PS
PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part