Re: What's the status on Xfree86 4.1.0?

[Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>]

>So I think there's good arguments for making lkab supply some kernels for
>more devices, but for Debian itself adding lart (and Riscstation if the
>patches are now avaialble?) is sufficient. 

I've no idea what the status is with the riscstation stuff.  It's been 
allegedly "almost ready for release" for the last year or so, but I've never 
seen any actual code.  But yeah, if patches did exist that would be a good 
thing to have support for.  I don't know whether it's similar enough to a 
RiscPC that they could share a single subarch -- that would be ideal from a 
release engineering standpoint, but there might be technical obstacles.

>(the netwinder kernels covers CATS too right?)

Right, and EBSA-285 too in theory.

p.