[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: BUG??

On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Philip Blundell wrote:

> In message <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.10.10101092258060.11424-100000@localhost.localdomain>, C
> hester writes:
> >It means that don't link with this or libiberty.a is broken??
> Depends on your point of view.  Libiberty isn't PIC code. 
> >I have remove this library from LD_LIBRARY_PATH,but still 
> >have the same error message!
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH is used at run time, not at link time.  You need to 
> investigate what happens when libSDL is built.
> >Which glibc versio is better??
> Well, the fix is in glibc 2.2.  The version on ftp.armlinux.org is actually 
> 2.1.3 with the patch in question back-ported.
> p.
I found the glibc-2.1.3 tarball on the ftp.armlinux.org!
The patch is arm-ld.so.dpatch and ldd.dpatch??


Reply to: