Re: Sub-architectures in update-modules
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Philip Blundell wrote:
> I don't have any strong feelings either way. "Footbridge" is obviously more
> generic and I guess it's the technically correct choice, but "netwinder" is
> more likely to mean something to the majority of people installing Debian. I
> imagine there are at least an order of magnitude more 'winders out there than
> there are EBSA-285s and CATS put together.
Yeah, and it fits in with everything done already (which is generally
named `netwinder'). Okay.
c.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: