[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sub-architectures in update-modules



On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Philip Blundell wrote:

> I don't have any strong feelings either way.  "Footbridge" is obviously more 
> generic and I guess it's the technically correct choice, but "netwinder" is 
> more likely to mean something to the majority of people installing Debian.  I 
> imagine there are at least an order of magnitude more 'winders out there than 
> there are EBSA-285s and CATS put together.

Yeah, and it fits in with everything done already (which is generally
named `netwinder').  Okay.

c.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: