Re: Sub-architectures in update-modules
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Philip Blundell wrote:
> I'm pretty sure "netwinder" is good for all three of these. Other than that,
> sounds fine. Most of the other platforms aren't suitable for standard Debian
> installs anyway, being weirdo embedded-type targets, so I reckon covering just
> the Footbridge and Acorn platforms is going to be enough.
Okay. Should the subarchitecture be called `footbridge' rather than
`netwinder', then?
c.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: