Re: Sub-architectures in update-modules

[Alexander.Schulz@stud.uni-karlsruhe.de (Alexander Schulz)]

> >  EBSA285            -> ?
> >  Rebel-Netwinder    -> netwinder
> >  Chalice-CATS       -> ?
> 
> I'm pretty sure "netwinder" is good for all three of these.  Other than that, 
> sounds fine.  Most of the other platforms aren't suitable for standard Debian 
> installs anyway, being weirdo embedded-type targets, so I reckon covering just 
> the Footbridge and Acorn platforms is going to be enough.

Hmm, I run a complete potato on my shark. But I must admit that I don´t know
exactly what this here means and if the shark would need somthing of its own
or share with some other architecture. I will have a deeper look when I find
the time.

Cheers
  Alexander


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org