Re: Sub-architectures in update-modules

[Philip Blundell <pb@tazenda.demon.co.uk>]

>  EBSA285            -> ?
>  Rebel-Netwinder    -> netwinder
>  Chalice-CATS       -> ?

I'm pretty sure "netwinder" is good for all three of these.  Other than that, 
sounds fine.  Most of the other platforms aren't suitable for standard Debian 
installs anyway, being weirdo embedded-type targets, so I reckon covering just 
the Footbridge and Acorn platforms is going to be enough.

>(boot-floppies now groks RISC OS disks, for those of you that care.)

Groovy.  Well, not that I care all that much, but still.

p.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org