[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: release in 2.2?



In the last mail Philip Blundell said:

> >For perl 5.005_03 compiled with egcs 1.1.1 with glibc2.1 I found 4 perl
> >regression tests that failed:
> >
> >lib/anydbm.t		C lib db implementation doesn't like "" keys
> >io/pipe.t, op/fork.t	StrongARM K bug bites
> >op/groups.t		C lib doesn't realise that sizeof(gid_t) in the kernel
> >			is 16 bit.
> 
> The latter of these should be fixed in the latest glibc, though I don't 
> offhand know what version Debian are currently using.  I think we agreed 
> that the former was a Perl testsuite problem rather than a bug.

I'm not sure who the "we" is, but perl expecting db implementation to take
zero length keys, and DB's dislike of this is a problem known to the perl
maintainers.
It seems that I'm one of the few people on perl5-porters running a glibc2.1
linux system :-)

Nick


Reply to: