Re: Util-linux (minus disk tools)
At 15:21 -0700 1998-09-17, David Welton wrote:
>The only thing I had to do to make it work, besides taking out the
>disk tools, was uncomment the 'semun' definition in <bits/sem.h>.
The 'semun' definition belongs in the source files that use it, previous
versions of glibc were in error (according to standards) for defining it.
<<
Envelope-to: jk@espy.org
To: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl>
Cc: libc-alpha@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: glibc-2.0.94: <sys/sem.h> doesn't include union semun
Reply-To: drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper)
X-fingerprint: BE 3B 21 04 BC 77 AC F0 61 92 E4 CB AC DD B9 5A
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>
Date: 18 Jun 1998 21:27:00 -0700
Lines: 13
Sender: owner-libc-alpha@cygnus.com
Precedence: bulk
Horst von Brand <vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl> writes:
> This is what semctl(2) seems to specify, anyway. This makes util-linux-2.8b
> fail its build. Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl told me <sys/sem_buf.h> (which
> contains the definition) is not mentioned by either SYSV or X/OPEN.
union semun must be specified by the application. It was a bug that
former glibc versions defined it.
--
---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com `------------------------
>>
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)
<URL:mailto:jk@espy.org> <URL:http://web.espy.org/>
Debian GNU/Linux user/developer on i386 and powerpc.
<URL:mailto:espy@debian.org> <URL:http://www.debian.org/>
Reply to: