[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#666926: apache2: Error on graceful restart: "(9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (client socket)"



Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.16-6+squeeze6
Severity: important


every day I found this in error.log:

[Sun Mar 25 06:25:54 2012] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing restart
[Sun Mar 25 06:25:54 2012] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (client socket)

apache2 processes grows, and I need to manually restart it.

-- Package-specific info:
List of enabled modules from 'apache2 -M':
  alias auth_basic authn_file authz_default authz_groupfile
  authz_host authz_user autoindex cgi deflate dir env expires include
  mime negotiation php5 reqtimeout rewrite setenvif ssl status
List of enabled php5 extensions:
  apc gd mcrypt mysql mysqli pdo pdo_mysql suhosin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=it_IT@euro, LC_CTYPE=it_IT@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages apache2 depends on:
ii  apache2-mpm-prefork    2.2.16-6+squeeze6 Apache HTTP Server - traditional n
ii  apache2.2-common       2.2.16-6+squeeze6 Apache HTTP Server common files

apache2 recommends no packages.

apache2 suggests no packages.

Versions of packages apache2.2-common depends on:
ii  apache2-utils          2.2.16-6+squeeze6 utility programs for webservers
ii  apache2.2-bin          2.2.16-6+squeeze6 Apache HTTP Server common binary f
ii  libmagic1              5.04-5+squeeze1   File type determination library us
ii  lsb-base               3.2-23.2squeeze1  Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip
ii  mime-support           3.48-1            MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  perl                   5.10.1-17squeeze3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  procps                 1:3.2.8-9         /proc file system utilities

-- no debconf information



Reply to: