[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Let's talk about SVN management



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Sandro,

On 19.11.2011 14:42, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Nope, no restructured repository, unless we reach a consensus on the
> VCS we're going to use. I replied to Stefan email about svn/git so I
> do think that we need first to iron out where we want to go :)

Fair enough. After all it's not a show stopper.

Speaking of: Could everyone who is still considering himself active
within the Apache packaging team make a short ping in this thread?

My intention to ask is to find out what's a reasonable number of
opinions to reach "consensus" here and I guess neither you nor do I want
to offend anyone here.


As a side note: Yes, ASF uses SVN upstream, but they do also provide a
git gateway, see [1][2].

> I suggested a debian/rules addition to remove the
> patch-that-are-actually-scripts - what do you think about it?

That's exactly what I did in my quick and dirty approach. That said,
there is not really any advantage over dpatch if you continue to patch
manually in rules afterwards.

I will work on Apache next week and send patches until next weekend you
all may comment. Any more discussion on that after putting things
together I'd say.

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
[2] http://git.apache.org/httpd.git/ or git://git.apache.org/httpd.git

- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=dgS8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: