Re: Let's talk about SVN management
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
On 07.11.2011 07:12, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> I would prefer switching to git, too. Therefore we should not put work
> into restructuring the svn repo, IMHO.
Sandro, do you have any plans in restructuring the repository? I am
undecided whether I shall wait for you working on that before starting
(finishing) to work on the stuff I announced to work on.
It's not a big deal to provide my self-made patches, but it would be
annoying if you would come up with a brand new repository a few days later.
> But I don't have any experience
> in maintaining a large complicated package in git, though. Do you? Is it
> necessary to import the complete upstream source with git? Though it may
> actually be a good idea, because we frequently have to backport commits
> from upstream's 2.2.x branch.
It is not needed, but of course, it is perfectly possible. There are
(too?) many workflows in git. Basically you can either track upstream's
VCS in a remote branch in git, or put orig.tar.gz tarballs in the
pristine-tar repository or not use any upstream source at all, or use
any combination of these.
That said, I am no git expert either, but I have some experience with
git|svn-buildpackage.
> If that's sorted
> out, I would prefer 3.0, too.
I will think about solutions for that problem soon(tm).
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=G4pZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: