[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#152564: marked as done (apache-common's suexec should use "/" for DOC_ROOT)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:30:39 +0000 (WET)
with message-id <20100324203039.A7741311E@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package apache-common has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #69818,
regarding apache-common's suexec should use "/" for DOC_ROOT
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
69818: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=69818
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apache-common
Version: 1.3.9-14.1

Every time I upgrade apache (numerous times on numerous systems for
several years), I have had to manually fix suexec.

Because suexec assumes all CGIs are under /var/www. But it is very common
for CGIs to be under /home too.

Please consider fixing apache-common package so suexec's docroot is "/"
(everything).

The error message:
 [2002-07-10 14:51:25]: error: command not in docroot
 (/home/b/bsdnewsletter.com/public_html/whatever/something.cgi)

This is apache-common  1.3.9-14.1. I am using Debian Linux 2.2, kernel
2.2.14, and libc 2.1.3-20 (not that that matters).

   Jeremy C. Reed
   http://www.reedmedia.net/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1.3.34-4.1+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/69818 in Debian BTS
against the package apache-common. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/418266. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---
Reply to: