[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#292122: marked as done (/etc/apache-ssl/httpd.conf is modified without questions on upgrade)



Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:31:42 +0000 (WET)
with message-id <20100324203142.D27043150@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package apache-ssl has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #292122,
regarding /etc/apache-ssl/httpd.conf is modified without questions on upgrade
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
292122: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292122
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apache-ssl
Version: 1.3.33-3
Severity: important

When I just upgraded apache-ssl, the postinst script did these modifications
without asking me: 

canardo:/etc/apache-ssl# cvs diff -u httpd.conf 
Index: httpd.conf
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/canardo_etc/apache-ssl/httpd.conf,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 httpd.conf
--- httpd.conf  5 Jan 2005 14:29:46 -0000       1.16
+++ httpd.conf  25 Jan 2005 08:21:01 -0000
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 
 ### Section 2: 'Main' server configuration
 BindAddress www.mork.no
-Port 80
+Port 443
 Listen www.mork.no:443
 Listen www.mork.no:80
 User www-data
@@ -417,3 +417,9 @@
 Include /etc/cacti/apache.conf
 </VirtualHost>
 
+
+# Automatically added by the post-installation script
+# as part of the transition to a config directory layout
+# similar to apache2, and that will help users to migrate
+# from apache to apache2 or revert back easily
+Include /etc/apache-ssl/conf.d


This is quite serious, since changing the bind port changes the configuration
in a way which cannot be done safely.  How would you know what the admins 
intentions are? 

Luckily, I also had a virtual server running on port 443, so I noticed an
uexpected error caused by the above change.


Bjørn

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages apache-ssl depends on:
ii  apache-common               1.3.33-3     support files for all Apache webse
ii  debconf                     1.4.30.11    Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                        1.10.26      Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.2                    4.2.52-17    Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1                   1.95.8-1     XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libmagic1                   4.12-1       File type determination library us
ii  libssl0.9.7                 0.9.7e-2     SSL shared libraries
ii  logrotate                   3.7-2        Log rotation utility
ii  mime-support                3.28-1       MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  openssl                     0.9.7e-2     Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a
ii  perl                        5.8.4-5      Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  ssl-cert                    1.0-11       Simple debconf wrapper for openssl

-- debconf information:
  apache-ssl/server-name: www.mork.no
  apache-ssl/server-admin: webmaster@mork.no
* apache-ssl/enable-suexec: true
  apache-ssl/init: true
  apache-ssl/document-root: /home/www/mork.no


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3.34-4.1+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/292122 in Debian BTS
against the package apache-ssl. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/418266. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues


--- End Message ---

Reply to: