On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 09:31:56AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hi all, > I'm following up the email below: > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 14:31, Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> wrote: > > So, I'm here to ask if you could consider backporting a more recent > > version of Apache (I see 2.2.15-2 reached testing, so it might be a > > good candidate). If I can help somehow, I'd be happy to, and I can > > even consider doing it myself (even though it's a quite big package > > and I'm not sure I can commit to maintain it properly in bpo), but I'd > > like to hear the opinion of the Debian Apache maintainers :) > > I've prepared some packages for backport, and copied on [1] (it's also > apt-get-able); I tested them and they work, at least SNI is fully > functional (that's my purpose) > > [1] http://people.debian.org/~morph/bpo/ Hi Sandro, we just have a running discussion at the CAcert.org system administrators list (CCed) to use a backported Apache version with SNI support and now you step in and solve our problem, many thanks. I will try your package and give feedback. > The chain of dependencies are: > > apache2 > +- openssl > +- apr-util > +- apr > +- libtool > > libtool was already in bpo, but was not compiled for amd64, so I've > just rebuilt it; the others are backports from the current versions in > testing. > > In CC the packages maintainers: I'd like them to have a look at those > packages before I (or they, no problem) push 'em to the repo; given > it's the first time I prepare some bpo and how important those > packages are, more eyes are better than my newbie ones only :) Regards Jan -- Jan Dittberner - Debian Developer GPG-key: 4096R/558FB8DD 2009-05-10 B2FF 1D95 CE8F 7A22 DF4C F09B A73E 0055 558F B8DD http://ddportfolio.debian.net/ - http://people.debian.org/~jandd/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature