[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#420673: marked as done (libapache-mod-perl-doc: Please update to a newer snapshot)



Your message dated Mon, 5 May 2008 12:54:53 +0100
with message-id <200805051154.m45Bsre2015161@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line libapache-mod-perl-doc has been removed from Debian, closing #420673
has caused the Debian Bug report #420673,
regarding libapache-mod-perl-doc: Please update to a newer snapshot
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
420673: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=420673
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libapache-mod-perl-doc
Version: 1.29.0.2-5cvs20040129
Severity: minor

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

This package provides a snapshot that is more than three years old.
Please update to a newer CVS snapshot.

Regards,

- -Roberto

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-k7
Locale: LANG=es_ES, LC_CTYPE=es_ES (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGLUC/5SXWIKfIlGQRAl8PAJ0SNOPlnSF32NLZGvmsITJhBFjt1QCfVRSg
jho48k2+wTCe+NytgEv9cH8=
=U5ka
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.29.0.2-5cvs20040129+rm

The libapache-mod-perl-doc package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/466119 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org


--- End Message ---

Reply to: