[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#434562: apache2.2-common: Segfaulting when using mod_authn_dbd with DBDriver pgsql



Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-5
Severity: normal

Seemingly, apache2.2-common does not bundle any file apr_dbd_pgsql.so
(which I gather [0] is needed when specifying DBDriver pgsql).

The above is guesswork on my part why my apache2.2 server segfaults upon
configuration file reading (and `strace apache2 -t` yields no useful
information except that apache seemingly gets past loading my
virtualhosts). It seems it cannot run something needed in that file.

As a consequence, I cannot proceed with upgrading the setup in [1] to a
DBD-and-authn-using-setup. However, I gather [2] that the deprecated
auth_pgsql module could still be used. I haven't tried that yet.

Also refer to [3], which seems to be a similar problem.

Regards, skrewz.

[0] http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_dbd.html#dbdriver
[1] http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/208
[2] http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_auth_basic.html#authbasicauthoritative
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405773


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages apache2.2-common depends on:
ii  apache2-utils                 2.2.3-5    utility programs for webservers
ii  libmagic1                     4.21-1     File type determination library us
ii  lsb-base                      3.1-23.1   Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip
ii  mime-support                  3.39-1     MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  net-tools                     1.60-17    The NET-3 networking toolkit
ii  procps                        1:3.2.7-3  /proc file system utilities

apache2.2-common recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



Reply to: