[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#258453: apache2-mpm-prefork: apache2 version 2.0.50-2 fails to start



Package: apache2-mpm-prefork
Version: 2.0.50-2
Severity: important



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.18
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages apache2-mpm-prefork depends on:
ii  apache2-common              2.0.49-1     Next generation, scalable, extenda
ii  libapr0                     2.0.50-2     The Apache Portable Runtime
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.2                    4.2.52-16    Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1                   1.95.6-8     XML parsing C library - runtime li

-- no debconf information

When I upgraded this morning, apache2 now fails to start.  I end up with
one apache2 process (instead of the number of children specified in
conf) which doesn't accept any http connections.  It also doesn't die
when I try /etc/init.d/apache2 stop, and I'm forced to kill it manually.

It shows up in ps aux like this:

www-data 16709  0.0  1.5  9860 3900 ?        S    11:44   0:00
/usr/sbin/apache2 -k start -DSSL

If I downgrade to 2.0.49-2, I'm able to start up successfully:

root     17383  0.5  0.9  5244 2304 ?        Ss   11:50   0:00
/usr/sbin/apache2 -k start -DSSL
www-data 17384  0.0  0.8  5188 2236 ?        S    11:50   0:00
/usr/sbin/apache2 -k start -DSSL
www-data 17385  0.0  0.9  5244 2320 ?        S    11:50   0:00
/usr/sbin/apache2 -k start -DSSL
www-data 17386  0.0  0.9  5244 2320 ?        S    11:50   0:00
/usr/sbin/apache2 -k start -DSSL
www-data 17387  0.0  0.9  5244 2320 ?        S    11:50   0:00
/usr/sbin/apache2 -k start -DSSL
www-data 17388  0.5  0.9  5244 2320 ?        S    11:50   0:00
/usr/sbin/apache2 -k start -DSSL
www-data 17389  0.0  0.9  5244 2320 ?        S    11:50   0:00
/usr/sbin/apache2 -k start -DSSL

Thanks.



Reply to: