[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#252678: marked as done (apache: apache: can't install in sid)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:44:14 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406111943140.10932@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>
and subject line Bug#252678: downgrading severity
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 2004 17:24:42 +0000
>From marcelo@marcelotoledo.org Fri Jun 04 10:24:42 2004
Return-path: <marcelo@marcelotoledo.org>
Received: from hm61.locaweb.com.br [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BWIQs-0006Ow-00; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 10:24:42 -0700
Received: (qmail 13654 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2004 17:24:21 -0000
Received: from hm10.locaweb.com.br (
  by hm61.locaweb.com.br with QMTP; 4 Jun 2004 17:24:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 32667 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2004 17:24:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO kali.intranet.marcelotoledo.org) (marcelo@marcelotoledo.org@
  by hm10.locaweb.com.br with SMTP; 4 Jun 2004 17:24:39 -0000
From: Marcelo Toledo <marcelo@marcelotoledo.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Cc: Jerome <bagattin@altern.org>, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Subject: apache: apache: can't install in sid
X-Debbugs-CC: Marcelo Toledo <marcelo@marcelotoledo.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:21:29 -0300
Message-ID: <[🔎] 87oenzfdd2.fsf@kali.intranet>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25

Package: apache
Version: 1.3.31-1
Severity: serious

As Jerome reported I am also having the same problem:

see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=251175

Setting up apache (1.3.31-1) ...
dpkg: error processing apache (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10

This bug is tagged as: moreinfo, unreproducible;

If Fabbione or anyone else would like to use this machine I can fix it
up so it can be reproducible. I am not in any related mailing list so
please remember to CC me.

Thank you,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.2.26

Versions of packages apache depends on:
ii  apache-common               1.3.31-1     Support files for all Apache webse
ii  debconf                     1.4.25       Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                        1.10.22      Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.2                    4.2.52-16    Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1                   1.95.6-8     XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libmagic1                   4.07-2       File type determination library us
ii  libpam0g                    0.76-21      Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  logrotate                   3.7-1        Log rotation utility
ii  mime-support                3.26-1       MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  perl                        5.8.4-2      Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- debconf information:
  apache/server-name: www.marcelotoledo.org
  apache/document-root: /var/www
  apache/server-port: 80
* apache/enable-suexec: false
  apache/init: true
  apache/server-admin: marcelo@marcelotoledo.org

Marcelo Toledo
Mobile: 55 71 9141-7181

Received: (at 252678-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2004 17:44:23 +0000
>From fabbione@fabbione.net Fri Jun 11 10:44:23 2004
Return-path: <fabbione@fabbione.net>
Received: from port1845.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk (trider-g7.fabbione.net) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BYq4k-0007fS-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:44:23 -0700
Received: from trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net (port1845.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk [])
	by trider-g7.fabbione.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26995A8;
	Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:44:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:44:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>
Sender: fabbione@fabbione.net
To: Marcelo Toledo <marcelo@marcelotoledo.org>
Cc: 252678-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#252678: downgrading severity
In-Reply-To: <87smd2j8rx.fsf@kali.intranet>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406111943140.10932@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406110846540.10932@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>
 <87r7smmibc.fsf@kali.intranet> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0406111356480.10932@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 252678-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25

On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Marcelo Toledo wrote:

> Fabio,
> believe or not but everything worked after removing and installing
> again...
> do you need anything after that?

No thanks. I am closing these 2 bugs since there are really of no help for
me. Hopefully someone will be able to reproduce them and provide

Thanks a lot anyway.

<user> fajita: step one
<fajita> Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
<user> fajita: step two
<fajita> When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.

Reply to: