Bug#225809: marked as done (apache2: can -dev packages depend on libdb-dev instead of libdb4.1-dev?)
Your message dated Sun, 9 May 2004 13:35:55 +0100
with message-id <20040509123555.GA6352@fugue.home.clearairturbulence.org>
and subject line This is just... silly :-)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jan 2004 20:30:11 +0000
>From root@gcs.org.hu Thu Jan 01 14:30:10 2004
Return-path: <root@gcs.org.hu>
Received: from gcs.barcika.tvnet.hu [195.38.121.22]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ac80d-0001g1-00; Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:57:27 -0600
Received: by gcs.barcika.tvnet.hu (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 4DFDA5385D; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:57:35 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: GCS <gcs@lsc.hu>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apache2: can -dev packages depend on libdb-dev instead of libdb4.1-dev?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 19:57:35 +0100
Message-Id: <20040101185735.4DFDA5385D@gcs.barcika.tvnet.hu>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apache2
Severity: wishlist
I do not know if it's by any means possible, but as both libdb4.1-dev and
libdb4.2-dev provides libdb-dev, would it be possible to depend -dev
packages on that?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux gcs 2.6.0-mm2 #2 Mon Dec 29 17:42:41 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 225809-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2004 12:31:09 +0000
>From thom@debian.org Sun May 09 05:31:09 2004
Return-path: <thom@debian.org>
Received: from (amnesiac.heapspace.net) [195.54.228.42]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BMnSX-000203-00; Sun, 09 May 2004 05:31:09 -0700
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by inject (Postfix) with SMTP id AEF3B57DF
for <225809-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 9 May 2004 13:30:38 +0100 (BST)
Received: from fugue.home.clearairturbulence.org (dev.bitch-whore.com [213.208.111.147])
by amnesiac.heapspace.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D81A57C2
for <225809-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 9 May 2004 13:30:37 +0100 (BST)
Received: by fugue.home.clearairturbulence.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6B4AE17745B; Sun, 9 May 2004 13:35:55 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 13:35:55 +0100
From: Thom May <thom@debian.org>
To: 225809-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: This is just... silly :-)
Message-ID: <20040509123555.GA6352@fugue.home.clearairturbulence.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: 225809-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
No way is this happening, so off you go.
--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iQIVAwUBQJ4lqrVnlGdHP376AQIF4w/+P8DO9RaGdwRnN+PzeYok93UGiwSovlJh
AcKLxUVS/tzi93hiGiGCJRNMEV5UWqlAJaoOKM7XHTVrGg29Tnx7tXUBX4BuofX2
2fKk2xhNfRTWu8yNs5vumqAj82eHS/Esut74ezKaQMSIS7efeIJri5sMvhD2p6Mz
Z8ycNKm5st3kDGTqxmZIF3ZTxgYr+5gM2EeA7UcuH/7QSyVsI0PngU1GySGIr/uw
A2JGCIbrbICbpV7wEmzFiQUzBsGKvAtCc2VKWLenhnoEDGMzw1hfQxUJSzL28Lgi
KJMsHKYr0MPzNyj75Fh9LBSnYLflrfHCEq1rObR1JWESWFx6rt3gmdqOgz6CSHNm
CQUOTEhGMIEC/5aIZ4+/X68aS8NC1FY3+op4KR8s+MrOKuF7uThp4XNIQxe9lvdc
kaLvmIj4aK81FtTTtJPjGDTI4cIEU0FDspdeDSJDt/yYIzxm9SvMBzOp0esviibd
Gi13yEvUDOK2MPax5sTfifPrMre0oFr4F2IDL/n+nAmwpvqeiL0x6qz70SYxAWjQ
wFod3runHV4Ni+43fjjYoOrFKVbOcD32ldG462tzcSYCYl4HuMbl/i97b4aa2+9b
CjE2MixtNd7JORhuqVofHd3CEb5QqpY4X4L/BGqFetVQufNPzulXzqxk/YbmM/p5
PUhquJ4caiY=
=W6OP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu--
Reply to: