Bug#226466: marked as done (apache2-doc: Multiviews for manual not working for me)
Your message dated Sun, 9 May 2004 13:17:27 +0100
with message-id <20040509121727.GA6260@fugue.home.clearairturbulence.org>
and subject line Just tested this
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2004 22:47:01 +0000
>From spam-from-debian-bugs@chezphil.org Tue Jan 06 16:47:00 2004
Return-path: <spam-from-debian-bugs@chezphil.org>
Received: from mta07-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.47]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AdyWz-00028k-00; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 15:14:29 -0600
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([81.104.195.128]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP
id <20040106211428.ODRE2588.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@[127.0.0.1]>;
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:14:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Phil Endecott <spam-from-debian-bugs@chezphil.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apache2-doc: Multiviews for manual not working for me
Bcc: Phil Endecott <spam-from-debian-bugs@chezphil.org>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 21:14:27 +0000
Message-Id: <20040106211428.ODRE2588.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@[127.0.0.1]>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apache2-doc
Version: 2.0.47-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I have just upgraded from apache1 to apache2 using the current
testing version. The manual from apache2-doc is not working. When
I view http://localhost/manual/ or http://localhost/manual/index.html
I see the content of the index.html file,
which is a list of the translations (type map?). I presume
that apache2 should have presented the contents of one of the
index.html.* files. If I view http://localhost/manual/index using
mozilla (1.5, latest version from testing) I see the contents of
index.xml, though not formatted - it is a long string of text.
Using Konqueror (older version) or lynx I do actually see the HTML, but
this links to other documents using URLs ending .html, and following
these I see the type map files.
I have wondered about:
- Am I missing some module necessary to do the content selection
correctly? I have a2enmod'd only cgi and info. I can't see
anything obvious. If there is one, apache2-doc should enable it.
- Is this something to do with my web clients? I don't think so,
because I have tried 3 and also I can view the same documentation
online at apache.org, and I guess that the online site has the
same style of content negotiation as the distributed package.
- Is there something in my apache2 configuration that is breaking the
content negotiation? I think this is most likely it, but it is
a completely fresh configuration (I have just purged and
re-installed it to be quite certain). It is not as simple as
multiviews not working, because I do see index.[ht|x]ml when I
ask for index. Is it something to do with the language selection?
I have just tried with only "en" in the accept-languages
mozilla preference, all the same.
- The "apache2 default page" does display correctly. When I view
http://localhost/ I see /var/www/apache2-default/index.html.en,
or .fr if I change my Mozilla language pref to french.
Please help (and forgive me if I am doing something stupid).
--Phil.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux andorra 2.4.18-1-686 #4 Sat Nov 29 10:18:26 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 226466-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2004 12:12:12 +0000
>From thom@debian.org Sun May 09 05:12:12 2004
Return-path: <thom@debian.org>
Received: from (amnesiac.heapspace.net) [195.54.228.42]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BMnAC-0000mL-00; Sun, 09 May 2004 05:12:12 -0700
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by inject (Postfix) with SMTP id D7E6C57E3
for <226466-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 9 May 2004 13:12:11 +0100 (BST)
Received: from fugue.home.clearairturbulence.org (dev.bitch-whore.com [213.208.111.147])
by amnesiac.heapspace.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A47E57D0
for <226466-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 9 May 2004 13:12:10 +0100 (BST)
Received: by fugue.home.clearairturbulence.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DF0D117745B; Sun, 9 May 2004 13:17:27 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 13:17:27 +0100
From: Thom May <thom@debian.org>
To: 226466-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Just tested this
Message-ID: <20040509121727.GA6260@fugue.home.clearairturbulence.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: 226466-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just did a clean install, and /manual/de and the others work correctly.
I've never been able to reproduce this problem, so I'm closing this bug.=20
--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)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=n+pt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--
Reply to: