[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#232946: marked as done (subversion: tighter apache dependencies needed?)

Your message dated Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:58:11 +0200
with message-id <20040418155811.GI31945@A-Eskwadraat.nl>
and subject line shlibs is now correct due to newer upstream
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2004 23:27:05 +0000
>From ross@biostat.ucsf.edu Sun Feb 15 15:27:05 2004
Return-path: <ross@biostat.ucsf.edu>
Received: from iron.libaux.ucsf.edu [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AsVfF-00085K-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:27:05 -0800
Received: from ross by iron.libaux.ucsf.edu with local (Exim 4.30)
	id 1AsVeh-0003e5-9y; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:26:31 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ross Boylan <ross@biostat.ucsf.edu>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: subversion: tighter apache dependencies needed?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:26:31 -0800
Message-Id: <E1AsVeh-0003e5-9y@iron.libaux.ucsf.edu>
Sender: Ross Boylan <ross@biostat.ucsf.edu>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ross@biostat.ucsf.edu
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 

Package: subversion
Version: 0.37.0-2
Severity: normal

INSTALL.gz indicates that Apache >= 2.0.48 is required.  However, I
was able to install subversion, as well as libapache2-svn, onto my
system leaving apache2 at 2.0.47.

I'm on a default testing system, using pinning to get subversion and
other goodies.

I don't know how serious a problem using an earlier version is, and I
do not have libapache2-dav-svn installed (I'm not currently using the
apache interface, but I'm about to.  I'll upgrade apache first.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux iron 2.4.24advncd #1 SMP Fri Jan 30 14:30:34 PST 2004 i686

Versions of packages subversion depends on:
ii  db4.2-util                  4.2.52-10    Berkeley v4.2 Database Utilities
ii  libapr0                     2.0.48-4     The Apache Portable Runtime
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.2                    4.2.52-8     Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1                   1.95.6-6     XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libldap2                    2.1.23-1     OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libneon24                   0.24.4-3     An HTTP and WebDAV client library
ii  libssl0.9.7                 0.9.7c-5     SSL shared libraries
ii  libsvn0                     0.37.0-2     Subversion shared libraries
ii  libxml2                     2.6.5-1      GNOME XML library
ii  patch                       2.5.9-1      Apply a diff file to an original
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.1-3    compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

Received: (at 231659-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2004 15:58:12 +0000
>From jeroen@wolffelaar.nl Sun Apr 18 08:58:12 2004
Return-path: <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BFEgO-0006St-00; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 08:58:12 -0700
Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BFEgN-0001Un-00; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:58:11 +0200
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:58:11 +0200
To: 232946-done@bugs.debian.org, 231659-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: shlibs is now correct due to newer upstream
Message-ID: <20040418155811.GI31945@A-Eskwadraat.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
Delivered-To: 231659-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Due to a newer upstream (2.0.49), the shlibs files now have >= 2.0.49,
because of which any non-binary compatibility within the 2.0.48 series
is now not relevant anymore -- versions older than 2.0.49 are now


Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)

Reply to: