Bug#225608: apache-ssl: post-installation script fails on upgrade (during --configure)
Package: apache-ssl
Version: 1.3.29.0.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
The upgrade of the apache-ssl packages fails, leaving it unconfigured. I
have a custom apache configuration, which works fine. However, the
post-installation script during the --configure phase gives the
following errors:
Can't read "/opt/apache"/"/opt/apache/vhosting-ssl"
No such file or directory
[total of 4 times]
Starting web server: apache-ssl failed
invoke-rc.d: initscript apache-ssl, action "start" failed.
If I start/stop apache with the /etc/init.d/apache-ssl script,
everything works fine. Previous upgrades of apache went fine, as far as
I recall. I haven't changed any of the configuration files between the
upgrades
Regards,
Pieter
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tandjes 2.4.23 #1 Tue Dec 2 23:05:12 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages apache-ssl depends on:
ii apache-common 1.3.29.0.1-3 Support files for all Apache webse
ii debconf 1.3.22 Debian configuration management sy
ii dpkg 1.10.18 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb4.1 4.1.25-10 Berkeley v4.1 Database Libraries [
ii libexpat1 1.95.6-6 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libkeynote0 2.3-10 Decentralized Trust-Management sys
ii libmagic1 4.06-2 File type determination library us
ii libpam0g 0.76-14 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7c-5 SSL shared libraries
ii logrotate 3.6.5-2 Log rotation utility
ii mime-support 3.23-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii openssl 0.9.7c-5 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a
ii perl [perl5] 5.8.2-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii ssl-cert 1.0-6 Simple debconf wrapper for openssl
-- debconf information:
apache-ssl/server-admin: pieter@internethoofdkantoor.nl
* apache-ssl/enable-suexec: false
apache-ssl/init: true
apache-ssl/server-name: tandjes
apache-ssl/document-root: "/usr/local/apache/htdocs"
Reply to: