[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#224049: libapache-mod-perl: Segmentaion fault when starting apache

Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net> [2003:12:17:08:19:39+0100] scribed:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> > Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net> [2003:12:17:06:29:51+0100] scribed:
> > >
> > > This problem has been already fixed in more recent versions of apache.
> > >
> > > Fabio
> >
> > What does this mean?  Is this only an issue of apache DEB version?
> no the problem is in perl that broke the ABI. apache is not guilty in this
> case. The problem has been fixed recompiling apache in version 1.3.28-1 so
> any version from that one to are working.
> >
> > By using the plural word, versions, do you mean that I have some other
> > choice than
> yes since you can grab packages from snapshot.debian.net or something
> similar but i highly unsuggest to get older versions than the latest one.
> > I have searched bugs for mod_perl, libapache-mod-perl and apache itself,
> > and I find no reference to this problem.
> The bugs have been archived.
> > Please, clarify.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=213974&archive=yes
> is one of them (as reference)

Thank you, for your help.

However, the problem persists!

# COLUMNS=110 dpkg -l '*apache*' | grep ^i
ii  apache                Versatile, high-performance HTTP server
ii  apache-common          Support files for all Apache webservers
ii  apache-utils          Utility programs for webservers
ii  libapache-mod-jk      3.3a-4woody1          Apache connector for Tomcat servlet engine
ii  libapache-mod-perl    1.27-4                Integration of perl with the Apache web server

What else need I do to get this functioning?

Best Regards,

mds resource
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .

Attachment: pgpjgc2n6pDYH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: