Bug#177705: marked as done (Woody i386: Apache 1.3.26)
Your message dated Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:31:46 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311271030140.12217@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2003 11:53:37 +0000
>From lars.nooden@ub.uit.no Tue Jan 21 05:53:37 2003
Return-path: <lars.nooden@ub.uit.no>
Received: from mux2.uit.no [129.242.5.252]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18awyE-00048X-00; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 05:53:34 -0600
Received: from victoria.ub.uit.no (victoria.ub.uit.no [129.242.170.254])
by mux2.uit.no (8.12.3/8.12.3/Mux) with ESMTP id h0LBrW75057214
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:53:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [129.242.170.88] (ubhs069-3.ub.uit.no [129.242.170.88])
by victoria.ub.uit.no (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h0LBsM322775
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:54:23 +0100 (MET)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: lno002@victoria.ub.uit.no
Message-Id: <a05200f0bba52e3fb2c9c@[129.242.170.88]>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:53:33 +0100
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
From: Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nood=E9n?= <lars.nooden@ub.uit.no>
Subject: Woody i386: Apache 1.3.26
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Virus-Scanned: : ok
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.26
Initial log files must be manually created. An unmodified Apache
installation fails to start and exits.
ubhs069-2:/www/htdocs# /usr/sbin/apachectl configtest &&
/etc/init.d/apache start
Syntax OK
Starting web server: apachefailed
A work-around is to 'touch' the log files, but this is really
something that /etc/init.d/apache or something else should do
automatically.
-Lars
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 177705-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Nov 2003 09:31:49 +0000
>From fabbione@fabbione.net Thu Nov 27 03:31:48 2003
Return-path: <fabbione@fabbione.net>
Received: from port5.ds1-sby.adsl.cybercity.dk (trider-g7.fabbione.net) [212.242.169.198]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1APIV2-0003pL-00; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 03:31:48 -0600
Received: from trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net (port5.ds1-sby.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.169.198])
by trider-g7.fabbione.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3A617
for <177705-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:31:46 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:31:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>
Sender: fabbione@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net
To: 177705-done@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311271030140.12217@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 177705-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_99 autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: *
Hi,
since there was no more response from the submitter of the bug and
given the fact noone has experienced this problem and it was not
reproducible either in chroots or live servers, i am closing this bug.
Fabio
--
Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol
"We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues
http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp00004.html
Reply to: