Re: virtual hosts
* Adam Conrad (adconrad@0c3.net) wrote :
> Thom May wrote:
> > * Andrew Shugg (andrew@neep.com.au) wrote :
> > > Thom May said:
> > > > it's a bit nasty, agreed. But I think !DEFAULT or similar
> > > > would get the point across quite well...
> > > > -Thom
> > >
> > > Apart from - and this is _really_ splitting hairs - people like me who
> > > look at '!foo' and think "not foo". But it's a clever idea and
> probably
> > > the best fix.
> > >
> > Yeah, I thought about that one. blah :-)
> > I honestly don't think that there's much I can do about that,
> > save document
> > it in the README.
>
> "_default_" sorts earlier than any RFC-allowed domain names, and has the
> advantage of being a POSIX portable filename that isn't a pain in the ass
> to work with in a shell. It also sticks out in 'ls', not just because it's
> first, but because it screams "look at me, I'm underlined -- sort of".
>
good call. I'll go with that then.
-thom
Reply to: