Re: Apache policy.
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:43:06AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:25:59PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > The proposed policy is in an early stage and right now it is
> > on http://www.opal.dhs.org/involved/debian/apache/
>
> i believe it is a mistake to spend any effort coercing apache 1.3
> (and its derivates apache-ssl and apache-perl) into any new framework.
> instead, concentrate on making apache2 as good as it can be. maybe it'll
> be worth making apache 1.3 obey a new framework, but let's prove it can
> work properly for apache2 first.
Maybe. I do not really know the state of apache2 but it might be
reasonable. I think we should think of the situation where using several
different apache:s is possible.
Do the apache2 framework make it possible to load such things as
perl/python/ssl as modules instead of the need of forking it?
Anyway what do people think of the ideas proposed in this document?
Regards,
// Ola
> --
> Revolutions do not require corporate support.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: