[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

pid xxxxx exit signal Segmentation fault (11)



Hello list,
My apache server has been running for a couple of days and ended up with
the following error msg:

[Tue Jul  2 21:23:12 2002] [notice] child pid 24466 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
[Tue Jul  2 21:23:12 2002] [notice] child pid 24465 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Tue Jul  2 21:23:12 2002] [notice] child pid 24464 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Tue Jul  2 21:23:12 2002] [notice] child pid 24463 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Tue Jul  2 21:23:12 2002] [notice] child pid 24462 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Tue Jul  2 21:23:12 2002] [notice] child pid 24461 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Tue Jul  2 21:23:12 2002] [notice] child pid 24460 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Tue Jul  2 21:23:12 2002] [notice] child pid 24459 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Tue Jul  2 21:23:12 2002] [notice] child pid 24458 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Tue Jul  2 21:23:13 2002] [notice] child pid 24521 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Tue Jul  2 21:23:13 2002] [notice] child pid 24519 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)


Any idea?

system info.
Linux luke 2.4.16 #7 SMP Thu Dec 13 09:09:23 CST 2001 i686 unknown

#dpkg -l | grep apache
ii  apache         1.3.26-0woody1 Versatile, high-performance HTTP server
ii  apache-common  1.3.26-0woody1 Support files for all Apache webservers
ii  apache-dev     1.3.26-0woody1 Apache webserver development kit
ii  apache-doc     1.3.26-0woody1 Apache webserver docs
ii  apache-ssl     1.3.26.1+1.48- Versatile, high-performance HTTP server with

# dpkg -l | grep gcc
ii  gcc            2.95.4-14      The GNU C compiler.
ii  gcc-2.95       2.95.4-7       The GNU C compiler.

-- 
Patrick Hsieh <pahud@pahud.net>
GPG public key http://pahud.net/pubkeys/pahudatpahud.gpg


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: