[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Unidentified subject!



I don't know if this mail is sent to me accidentally or it is a spam, but
I did not send this message. It is send to me, either it has different To:
field from my address (orinc@czech.net). I'm writing this just in case I
should be removed from this list.
So I state explicitly:
	I don't want to be removed from this list, I've not send message
cited in attached letter, and I have no knowledge who sent it.

				Petr Barta

> Return-Path: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> Received: from ns.czech.net (root@ns.Czech.Net [194.213.224.1]) by scretchy.luko.cz (8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA21099 for <orinc@czn.cz>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 21:08:39 +0200
> Received: from debian.novare.net (debian.novare.net [205.229.104.5]) by ns.czech.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA20451 for <orinc@czech.net>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 21:18:35 +0200
> Received: (qmail 9387 invoked by uid 38); 2 Apr 1997 19:21:53 -0000
> Resent-Date: 2 Apr 1997 19:21:53 -0000
> Resent-Cc: recipient.list.not.shown:;
> X-Envelope-Sender: debian-announce-request@lists.debian.org
> From: debian-announce-request@lists.debian.org
> Date: 2 Apr 1997 19:19:16 -0000
> Message-ID: <19970402191916.8997.qmail@debian.novare.net>
> To: xbigfoot@bigfoot.com
> References: <19970402191915.8976.qmail@debian.novare.net>
> In-Reply-To: <19970402191915.8976.qmail@debian.novare.net>
> X-Loop: debian-announce@lists.debian.org
> Resent-Message-ID: <"zbjXg.0.SG2.C7hGp"@debian>
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Unidentified subject!
> X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1883
> X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Precedence: list
> Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> 
>               32760 xbigfoot@bigfoot.com
> xbigfoot@bigfoot.com
> 
> You have been removed from the list.
> 
> If this wasn't your intention or you are having problems getting yourself
> unsubscribed, reply to this mail now (quoting it entirely (for diagnostic
> purposes), and of course adding any comments you see fit).


Reply to: