[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT: complaints about systemd

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:53:56AM +0200, Michael wrote:
> where did you find that ?

I searched for the message I got at shutdown.  This was on amd64.
Hardly an unusual architecture. :)

> Not here ?
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&product=systemd
> If you talk ARM then #74280 could apply. Besides pulseaudio IIRR is from the same folks. It's also - since years - among the first things i rip off standard installations.
> Or maybe ?
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33421
> which demonstrates a nice shot in their own knee, plus Big L (c) favorite approach to solve systemd bugs: By adding systemd support to xyz package. Well, on second thought they went for the standard ugly workaround (around design flaws).
> My bad mood again, i need my pills |-)
> ugh i really think it's time to change the subject (done.)

And overly complicated system that wasn't designed with proper debuging
in mind.

Len Sorensen

Reply to: