Re: Time to change the debian-ports "list"?
Steven Chamberlain dixit:
>On 05/09/14 18:39, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> * Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal*
>> mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it [...]
>
>That sounds perfect IMHO. It could be used for general discussion about
>porting, upcoming new ports, or any ports that don't quite merit having
>their own mailing list yet.
Agreed, all that plus the dpo infrastructure, buildd and
wanna-build related setup (possibly for both dpo and the
main archive), etc.
>> "debian-cross-ports" or "debian-architectures" or something.
>
>I'd prefer not to have it, or have to sign up to it as a porter. It'd
>probably get more spam than useful mail.
Agree.
>I can't think of a reason to mail *all* ports that wouldn't be
>appropriate for debian-devel-announce; or if your mail only concerns a
>few ports it should be convenient to cross-post to the relevant ports'
>lists only.
Fully agree.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
<gcc> ncal.c: In function 'parsemonth': warning: comparison between pointer
and integer • <mirabilos> ↑ hab da „in function parselmouth“ gelesen
<Natureshadow> ICH AUCH! • <Natureshadow> Ich hab gerade gedacht "Häh? Wie,
hab da parselmouth gelesen ... steht da doch auch :o?" -- too much fanfic…
Reply to: