Re: nvidia-kernel modules and >2.6.25?
Someone have a prepacked debian way version with that patch and this
work with 2.6.25-2-amd64 too...
it's stable enough 173.08?
anyone have this debian way packed?
On 5/14/08, Lennart Sorensen <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 04:33:07PM +0000, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 May 2008 15:50:15 +0200, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > I am working on it. 173.08 builds fine with 2.6.25 so if nothing else I
> > > can compare 169.12 with 173.08 and see what nvidia changed to get around
> > > the change.
> > Lennart,
> > bug #476504, and in particular this comment:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476504#32
> > worked just fine for me. Maybe you should just include the patch from
> > nvidia?
> That patch does NOT compile for me with 2.6.25-2-amd64 which just
> entered Debian unstable. I made a patch based on 173.08's changes which
> does compile. It's a bit longer than the patch mentioned in that bug
> report but apparently the extra changes are relevant to some things. So
> it might have been fine for 2.6.25-1 but isn't good enough for 2.6.25-2.
> LeN Sorensen
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
Perhaps the depth of
love can be calibrated by the number of different selves that are
actively involved in a given relationship.
Carl Sagan (Contact)
Jaime Ochoa Malagón
Arquitecto de Soluciones Cel: +52 (55) 1021 0774