Re: Ideas why dvd playback is jerky?
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 15:52 +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> which player are you using?
I've tried mplayer, codeine, ogle, totem, and vlc. Totem ca't read the
disc.
>
> what else is running? whats cpu usage like?
I disabled everything else including xscreensaver, and shutdown folding
@home as well. Essentially no processes outside that of the system and
X, excepting evolution. I run fluxbox for WM.
I have 2 Gb Mushkin memory.
** One thing that comes to mind is that I have no patch audio wires from
the player to the MB at this point. Could this make a big difference in
what the player has to do to get things to work?
I saw a fair amount of output from codeine about dropped frames (being
too old) as well as other issues. I can post some of that in a separate
email.
Kenward
>
> Dean
>
> Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> > Is this an issue with the amd64 arch, or something else? I have an AMD
> > 5600+ cpu paired with an Nvidia 7600 GS card, which strikes me as more
> > than adequate to work with a DVD (my older XP 2500+ had no problems...).
> >
> > The video is literally jerky, and poorly sync'd with the audio. It
> > doesn't seem to matter what player I use.
> >
> > I have done nothing with card settings, but do have the latest driver in
> > place. Relavent parts of my xorg.conf:
> >
> > -----
> > Section "Module"
> > Load "i2c"
> > Load "bitmap"
> > Load "ddc"
> > # Load "dri"
> > Load "extmod"
> > Load "freetype"
> > Load "glx"
> > Load "int10"
> > Load "vbe"
> > EndSection
> > ...
> >
> > Section "Device"
> > Identifier "nVidia Corporation G70 [GeForce 7600 GS]"
> > Driver "nvidia"
> > BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
> > EndSection
> > -----
> >
> > Is there other info I could provide?
> >
> > Anyone have thoughts which might help? Should I install a 32 bit system
> > on this machine for these things?
> >
> >
> > Kenward
--
The church says the earth is flat, but I know that it is round, for I
have seen the shadow on the moon, and I have more faith in a shadow than
in the church. --Ferdinand Magellan
Reply to: