[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64



Hi
   Edit  openoffice.org-2.0.3/debian/rules and there is some variable
build_amd64???=n that should be y
I only started building it seemed to work properly after that change.

Hope it helps
Gudjon

Þann Mánudagur 24. júlí 2006 23:13 skrifaði Emmanuel Fleury:
> Hi,
>
> A J Stiles wrote:
> > I do not *want* pre-built .debs.  What I specifically want is to compile
> > the whole thing from source on my own machine.
>
> Do the following:
>
> 1) Get the sources:
> 	apt-get source openoffice.org
>
> 2) Get the packages needed to compile it:
> 	su -c 'apt-get build-dep openoffice.org'
>
> 3) Go in the directory:
> 	cd openoffice.org-2.0.3
>
> 4) Build-it:
> 	dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
>
> ...
>
> Unfortunately, it doesn't work. :-/
>
> I get a lot of errors:
>
> ...
> dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-cy in control file
> but not in files list
> dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-ko in control file
> but not in files list
> dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-fr in control file
> but not in files list
> dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-hr in control file
> but not in files list
> dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-ar in control file
> but not in files list
> dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-ja in control file
> but not in files list
> dpkg-genchanges: not including original source code in upload
> dpkg-buildpackage: binary and diff upload (original source NOT included)
>
> If you find the way to get through this tell me, because I also would
> like to compile it. :)
>
> Regards
> --
> Emmanuel Fleury              | Office: 211
> Associate Professor,         | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
> LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax:   +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
> 351, Cours de la Libération  | email: fleury@labri.fr
> 33405 Talence Cedex, France  | URL: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury



Reply to: