Re: Etch security updates

[Francesco Pietra <frapietra@alice.it>]

Hi Goswin:

Thank you. It seems that everything is clear. Why then so many questions in 
the last few days on this e-mail list about these affairs, with claims of 
accidents, such as destroyed 64bit X-system, or other, because of changing 
repositories? If I understand you mail, these accidents simply arose from not 
following the (standing) indications reported below. Please correct me if 
otherwise.

Thanks again while I apologize for shaking the water but from time to time 
repetita juvant.
 
francesco pietra

On Saturday 27 May 2006 10:06, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Francesco Pietra <frapietra@alice.it> writes:
> > Hi Len:
> >
> > Apparently amd64 debian testing has been successfully installed on many
> > computers. Because this is a rapidly moving sector of debian - attended
> > by the risk of damaging successful installations during update or package
> > search - may I suggest that a list of
> >
> > --Security updates
>
> Go to the debian security list.
>
> > --Repositories (sources)
>
> Is the one and only debian archive.
>
> > --Signatures
>
> Changes once a year for testing/unstable and on every release for
> stable and goes to debians announce list.
>
> > (or what else may be better needed to the above scope)
> > appears daily (or nearly so) on debian-amd64@lists.debian.org?
>
> So what should we report? Every time, week in and week out: "All is
> the same as ever"?
>
> MfG
>         Goswin