Re: OpenOffice-2.0.
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 12:32:35PM +0000, Chris Wakefield wrote:
> I guess I could have made myself a little more clear.
> I understand the 64 bit OO2 progress, thanks.
>
> I noticed that OO2 is not offered in any linux binary except those wrapped in
> rpm's I was thinking that OO2 would come with the same installer as 1.2
> did....I think it was a _bin_ ? Anyways, I tried converting the OO2 rpm's
> to debs, but ran into a few problems and was hoping there was a simpler way.
>
> By-the-way, I still don't understand why one would need to set up a 32 bit
> chroot just to run OO when we have 32 bit emulation?
There are 32bit OO2 binaries in sid on i386. No reason to use rpms.
Len Sorensen
Reply to: