Re: Compiling a kernel module. gcc-3.3 vs. gcc-3.4
Why should he not change the link? Changing the link is what I did. Why should
the link point to one version of gcc or another? If anything, I would assume
that you would want to point it to the version that corrseponds to the version
that the kernel was compiled against, if for no other reason that to avoid this
very issue.
jamie.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 04:10:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> James Hansen <debian-amd64@f0rmula.com> writes:
>
> > Thanks for everyone's replies on this. Much appreciated. I've built
> > the module using gcc-3.4 and it's inserted into the kernel happily
> > enough. (by changing the gcc symlink)
>
> Don't change the link. Set CC or similar.
>
> MfG
> Goswin
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: