Re: AMD64 packages in flux
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 09:24 -0500, Damon Chesser wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> ia32-libs: Depends: lsb-release but it is not installable
> E: Broken packages
>
> Package lsb-release is not available, but is referred to by another
> package.
> This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
> is only available from another source
> E: Package lsb-release has no installation candidate
You might want to update again...
james@mariner:~$ apt-cache showpkg lsb-release
Package: lsb-release
Versions:
1.4-8(/var/lib/apt/lists/bytekeeper.as28747.net_debian-amd64_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages)(/var/lib/dpkg/status)
Reverse Depends:
lsb-core,lsb-release
ia32-libs,lsb-release
Dependencies:
1.4-8 -
Provides:
1.4-8 -
Reverse Provides:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> nvidia-glx: Depends: nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174 but it is not installable
> E: Broken packages
>
>
> ii nvidia-kernel- 1.0.7174-1 NVIDIA binary kernel module common files
> ii nvidia-kernel- 1.0.7174-3 NVIDIA binary kernel module source
>
This is still an issue I believe but if you check the list archives,
you'll see you can still get to the old packages with these apt lines:
deb http://bytekeeper.as28747.net/debian-amd64-alioth-old/pure64/ sarge
non-free
deb http://bytekeeper.as28747.net/debian-amd64-alioth-old/pure64/ sid
non-free
> I know this and all of debian is kept up by people donating their time.
> Two weeks ago, this problem did not exists. Any idea on when this will
> get fixed to make amd64 usable with a 32chroot. I did my trial run two,
> maybe three weeks ago, then I set this box up the way I wanted and now I
> run into this mess. Not pushing, just asking for a ballpark estimate of
> how long the chaos will last. FWIW, I have been following debian amd64
> for a long time, and I think you all do a wonderfull job.
>
> P.S.
> I AM using the bytekeeper repos
>
>
> --
> Damon L. Chesser
> damon@damtek.com
Reply to: