[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: need advice for correct sources.list because of broken packages



On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 11:40:53PM +0200, Alexander Nagel wrote:
> redkeep:/home/alex# LC_ALL=POSIX apt-get -o 
> Debug::pkgProblemResolver=true install libgtk2.0-dev
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Starting
> Starting 2
> Investigating zlib1g-dev
> Package zlib1g-dev has broken dep on zlib1g
>   Considering zlib1g 1009 as a solution to zlib1g-dev 4
>   Holding Back zlib1g-dev rather than change zlib1g
> Investigating libfreetype6-dev
> Package libfreetype6-dev has broken dep on zlib1g-dev
>   Considering zlib1g-dev 4 as a solution to libfreetype6-dev 3
>   Holding Back libfreetype6-dev rather than change zlib1g-dev
> Package libfreetype6-dev has broken dep on libz-dev
>   Considering zlib1g-dev 4 as a solution to libfreetype6-dev 3
>   Holding Back libfreetype6-dev rather than change libz-dev
>   Or group keep for libfreetype6-dev
> Investigating libfontconfig1-dev
> Package libfontconfig1-dev has broken dep on libfreetype6-dev
>   Considering libfreetype6-dev 3 as a solution to libfontconfig1-dev 1
>   Holding Back libfontconfig1-dev rather than change libfreetype6-dev
> Investigating libpango1.0-dev
> Package libpango1.0-dev has broken dep on libfreetype6-dev
>   Considering libfreetype6-dev 3 as a solution to libpango1.0-dev 1
>   Holding Back libpango1.0-dev rather than change libfreetype6-dev
> Investigating libxft-dev
> Package libxft-dev has broken dep on libfontconfig1-dev
>   Considering libfontconfig1-dev 1 as a solution to libxft-dev 0
>   Holding Back libxft-dev rather than change libfontconfig1-dev
> Investigating libgtk2.0-dev
> Package libgtk2.0-dev has broken dep on libpango1.0-dev
>   Considering libpango1.0-dev 1 as a solution to libgtk2.0-dev 9999
>     Reinst Failed early because of zlib1g
>     Reinst Failed because of zlib1g-dev
>     Reinst Failed because of zlib1g-dev
>     Reinst Failed because of libfreetype6-dev
> Investigating xlibs-static-dev
> Package xlibs-static-dev has broken dep on zlib1g-dev
>   Considering zlib1g-dev 4 as a solution to xlibs-static-dev 6
>   Holding Back xlibs-static-dev rather than change zlib1g-dev
> Package xlibs-static-dev has broken dep on libz-dev
>   Considering zlib1g-dev 4 as a solution to xlibs-static-dev 6
>   Holding Back xlibs-static-dev rather than change libz-dev
>   Or group keep for xlibs-static-dev
> Investigating libgtk2.0-dev
> Package libgtk2.0-dev has broken dep on libpango1.0-dev
>   Considering libpango1.0-dev 1 as a solution to libgtk2.0-dev 9999
> Investigating libx11-dev
> Package libx11-dev has broken dep on xlibs-static-dev
>   Considering xlibs-static-dev 6 as a solution to libx11-dev 8
>   Holding Back libx11-dev rather than change xlibs-static-dev
> Investigating libxi-dev
> Package libxi-dev has broken dep on libx11-dev
>   Considering libx11-dev 8 as a solution to libxi-dev 6
>   Holding Back libxi-dev rather than change libx11-dev
> Investigating libxrender-dev
> Package libxrender-dev has broken dep on libx11-dev
>   Considering libx11-dev 8 as a solution to libxrender-dev 1
>   Holding Back libxrender-dev rather than change libx11-dev
> Investigating libxv-dev
> Package libxv-dev has broken dep on libx11-dev
>   Considering libx11-dev 8 as a solution to libxv-dev 0
>   Holding Back libxv-dev rather than change libx11-dev
> Investigating libgtk2.0-dev
> Package libgtk2.0-dev has broken dep on libpango1.0-dev
>   Considering libpango1.0-dev 1 as a solution to libgtk2.0-dev 9999
> Package libgtk2.0-dev has broken dep on libx11-dev
>   Considering libx11-dev 8 as a solution to libgtk2.0-dev 9999
>   Re-Instated libxi-dev
>   Re-Instated libxv-dev
>     Reinst Failed because of zlib1g-dev
>     Reinst Failed because of zlib1g-dev
>     Reinst Failed because of xlibs-static-dev
> Package libgtk2.0-dev has broken dep on xlibs-dev
>   Considering xlibs-dev 4 as a solution to libgtk2.0-dev 9999
>   Re-Instated libice-dev
>   Re-Instated libsm-dev
>     Reinst Failed because of libx11-dev
> Investigating libxi-dev
> Package libxi-dev has broken dep on libx11-dev
>   Considering libx11-dev 8 as a solution to libxi-dev 6
>   Holding Back libxi-dev rather than change libx11-dev
> Investigating libxv-dev
> Package libxv-dev has broken dep on libx11-dev
>   Considering libx11-dev 8 as a solution to libxv-dev 0
>   Holding Back libxv-dev rather than change libx11-dev
> Investigating libgtk2.0-dev
> Package libgtk2.0-dev has broken dep on libpango1.0-dev
>   Considering libpango1.0-dev 1 as a solution to libgtk2.0-dev 9999
> Package libgtk2.0-dev has broken dep on libx11-dev
>   Considering libx11-dev 8 as a solution to libgtk2.0-dev 9999
> Package libgtk2.0-dev has broken dep on xlibs-dev
>   Considering xlibs-dev 4 as a solution to libgtk2.0-dev 9999
> Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> 
> Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
> the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
> that package should be filed.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   libgtk2.0-dev: Depends: libpango1.0-dev (>= 1.4.0-3) but it is not 
> going to be installed
>                  Depends: libx11-dev but it is not going to be installed or
>                           xlibs-dev but it is not going to be installed
> E: Broken packages

Hmm, are you sure _all_ your packages are from pure64 and not a mix of
packages from each of the two?

I wonder if apt-show-versions could tell.

Len Sorensen



Reply to: