[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: need advice for correct sources.list because of broken packages



Javier Kohen schrieb:
Hallo Alex,

El sáb, 09-04-2005 a las 01:39 +0200, Alexander Nagel escribió:


When i use
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sarge main contrib non-free

redkeep:/home/alex# apt-get install -V libgtk2.0-dev
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig
Die folgenden zusätzlichen Pakete werden installiert:
   libatk1.0-dev (1.8.0-4)
   libexpat1-dev (1.95.8-1)
   libfontconfig1-dev (2.3.1-2)
   libfreetype6-dev (2.1.7-2.3)
   libglib2.0-0 (2.6.4-1)
   libglib2.0-dev (2.6.4-1)
   libgtk2.0-0 (2.6.4-1)
   libgtk2.0-bin (2.6.4-1)
   libgtk2.0-common (2.6.4-1)
   libpango1.0-dev (1.8.1-1)
   libx11-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
   libxext-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
   libxft-dev (2.1.7-1)
   libxft2 (2.1.7-1)
   libxi-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
   libxrender-dev (0.8.3-7)
   libxv-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
   render-dev (0.8-4)
   x-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
   xlibs-static-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
   zlib1g-dev (1.2.2-4)
Vorgeschlagene Pakete:
   xspecs (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
Empfohlene Pakete:
   libglib2.0-data (2.6.4-1)
Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden installiert:
   libatk1.0-dev (1.8.0-4)
   libexpat1-dev (1.95.8-1)
   libfontconfig1-dev (2.3.1-2)
   libfreetype6-dev (2.1.7-2.3)
   libglib2.0-dev (2.6.4-1)
   libgtk2.0-dev (2.6.4-1)
   libpango1.0-dev (1.8.1-1)
   libx11-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
   libxext-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
   libxft-dev (2.1.7-1)
   libxi-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
   libxrender-dev (0.8.3-7)
   libxv-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
   render-dev (0.8-4)
   x-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
   xlibs-static-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
   zlib1g-dev (1.2.2-4)
Die folgenden Pakete werden aktualisiert:
   libglib2.0-0 (2.6.3-1 => 2.6.4-1)
   libgtk2.0-0 (2.6.2-4 => 2.6.4-1)
   libgtk2.0-bin (2.6.2-4 => 2.6.4-1)
   libgtk2.0-common (2.6.2-4 => 2.6.4-1)
   libxft2 (2.1.2-6 => 2.1.7-1)
5 aktualisiert, 17 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 141 nicht aktualisiert.
Es müssen 19,4MB Archive geholt werden.
Nach dem Auspacken werden 66,2MB Plattenplatz zusätzlich benutzt.
Möchten Sie fortfahren? [J/n]


it seems to work but with lot's of new packages.
Why are there so much differences??
Two different sarge or is the second sid??


Sorry that I cannot advice you about the first part of the mail, with
the missing packages, but the second part is alright. What's going on
there is that you're trying to install a development package that
depends on X, therefore it brings all the X development packages as
well, and that means dozens of packages.

That is clear.
But
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sarge main contrib non-free
is mentioned in the FAQ so it's some kind official
and therefore these packages seems to be broken.
And the other adress:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sarge main contrib non-free
seems to work but wants to install newer packages which are in SID (IMHO).
Greets
Alex



Reply to: