[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: udev segfaulting, problems with udev



Same here with amd64 _AFTER_ upgrading to 048...

Rafael Rodríguez

El Lunes, 13 de Diciembre de 2004 22:21, Jean-Luc Coulon escribió:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 05:09:50PM -0500, Bharath Ramesh wrote:
> > I just re-installed my machine and started to use udev. Every restart I
> > udev seg faults. This what it gives out in the dmesg
> >
> > udev[2413]: segfault at 0000000000000138 rip 0000000000402fa4 rsp
> > 0000007fbffff1 c0 error 4
> > udev[2416]: segfault at 0000000000000138 rip 0000000000402fa4 rsp
> > 0000007fbffff1 c0 error 4
> > udev[2452]: segfault at 0000000000000138 rip 0000000000402fa4 rsp
> > 0000007fbffff1 c0 error 4
> > udev[2482]: segfault at 0000000000000138 rip 0000000000402fa4 rsp
> > 0000007fbffff1 c0 error 4
> > udev[2519]: segfault at 0000000000000138 rip 0000000000402fa4 rsp
> > 0000007fbffff1 c0 error 4
> > udev[2526]: segfault at 0000000000000138 rip 0000000000402fa4 rsp
> > 0000007fbffff1 c0 error 4
> > udev[2562]: segfault at 0000000000000138 rip 0000000000402fa4 rsp
> > 0000007fbffff1 c0 error 4
> > udev[2719]: segfault at 0000000000000138 rip 0000000000402fa4 rsp
> > 0000007fbffff1 c0 error 4
> > udev[2726]: segfault at 0000000000000138 rip 0000000000402fa4 rsp
> > 0000007fbffff1 c0 error 4
> >
> > The other thing I have noticed is that it doesnt create the device nodes
> > for my other hard IDE hard drive. I am using my SATA hard drive but I
> > use my IDE hard drive for backups. I load the module for my IDE
> > controller at bootup.
> >
> > The other error is with usb I get this error continuously
> >
> > driver/usb/input/hid-core.c input irq status -75 received
>
> I've got a segfault of udev in the same conditions on a i386 machine (K6-2
> 500 running 2.6.9).
> The version of udev was 0.042.
> This have been fixed with version 0.046 of udev (Debian sid).
>
> The bug reference is ##281107
>
> So, maybe it is not specially related to amd64...
>
> > Any help on this is appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bharath
>
> Regards
>
> Jean-Luc



Reply to: