On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 06:26:25PM -0700, Steven L. Johnson wrote: > marc.miller@amd.com wrote: > > >Our concern is that by choosing AMD64 as the port name, it could forfeit > >its compliance with the x86-64 LSB. > > > At first glance that seems unlikely, especially since the latest docs > call the > architecture AMD64, not x86-64. I refer to LSB-Core-AMD64. I don't > understand how using the same name for the Debian arch conflicts. > http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/specs.php Refer to LSB-Packaging-AMD64 instead. We could still use amd64 if we can somehow accept installing x86_64 lsb rpm's in Debian though (I think). Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature