Re: 3 Hour Landslide: amd64
Eric Sharkey <sharkey@netrics.com> writes:
>> You vote is meaningless since it lets IPs vote. We have only 23
>> members in debian-amd64 so obviously you have more votes that votees.
>>
>> This could be intrested people from the ML that don't work on the
>> debian-amd64 team (yet) or any person with multiple IPs like any
>> dial-in person has.
>
> Do you really, honestly suspect ballot stuffing in this case?
> Are people here really that petty?
Yes. One idiot is enough.
> There are more than enough people on the list to account for
> the votes:
>
> mastermind% grep -h ^From `pick +debian --list-id debian-amd64 last:5000` | sort | uniq | wc -l
> 149
>
> Are you suggesting that the opinion of interested people from the
> ML is meaningless?
>
> Eric
>
> P.S. I voted (only once) for amd64.
Going from "decision signed by all" as requested yb the dpkg
maintainer to such a tampering inviting system might not cut it with
the dpkg maintainer regardless on the numbers.
MfG
Goswin
Reply to: