Re: 3 Hour Landslide: amd64
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 12:15:24PM +0100, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> It does seem a bit petty... the result was unanimous and even if one or
> two votes were 'stuffed' it wouldn't affect the overall result (actually
> given that level of landslide it would require 98 'stuffed' amd64 votes
> out of the total 115 to have a material affect on the result). Are we
> adopting the florida voting system? - endless recounds until the
> 'correct' result is achieved?
We should ask Slashdot to setup a poll. Everything else is ambiguous.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
mbanck@debian.org
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
Reply to: