On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 10:39:42PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 10:33:18PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > In order for the pure64 port to be more visible, I opt for the following > > thinks to be done by someone who actually has the permissions for it: > > > > 1. set the development status of the alioth project to either "Mature" > > or "Production/Stable". > > I don't think this is really accurate. What milestones do you think we still have to reach before getting to that point? I am not saying it should be considered "Mature" but I was just wondering what you think we should base our decision on. 1. We are at 93.5% compiled (most remaining packages have FTBFS RC bugs) 2. We have a working debian-installer image (I think?) 3. ... The only major roadblock that I currently know of is the lack of a working native 64bit bootloader. Chris Cheney BTW - I am currently at M on processing the broken packages, so I have checked roughly half of the broken packages.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature